Mary Douglas (1982) proposed that there are only a limited number of social models on which people form their social relations based on a two dimensional classificatory scheme of grid and group. She proposed that each of the four types of social environments formed through the combination of grid and group has its own particular cosmology and way of life, particularly attitudes toward risk and change. This scheme was later developed and elaborated by Thompson, Ellis and Wildavsky 1990, and Lingenfelter 1992, 1996. These prototypes have been helpful in describing predictable differences in theological interpretations, (Wildavsky 1984, Atkins 1991, Malina 1986), perceptions of risk and change (Douglas and Wildavsky 1982, Gross and Rayner 1985) perceptions of science and nature (Bloor and Bloor 1982) and perceptions towards resources, labor, and authority (Lingenfelter 1992 Harris 1996a). This paper explores Douglas’ first introduction of the model and then later elaboration, development, and use of the model by others to explain differences in social relationships and cultural bias. It then uses Douglas’ model to explore how differences in social environment of groups within first century Palestine explains in part their different response to Jesus and His message.